Urban Planning

I graduated with an Urban Planning Master's degree program at UCLA in June 2009. My focus was on sustainability and climate change.

Links to some groups that I was involved with at UCLA:

The Environmental Analysis and Policy concentration
Sustainable Urban Network
Leaders in Sustainability

From January to August 2008, I worked as a Researcher at the Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies. In 2008-9, I continued to work on my thesis on carbon capping and consumer costs in the electricity and transportation sector. Beginning in January 2009, I conducted research for a professor looking at factors affecting cities' decisions to join local climate change programs.

Links to my papers and publications:

GHGs in CEQA: Considerations for Lead Agencies (pdf)

Water Efficiency Opportunities in the LEED-EB retrofit of UCLA's Public Affairs Building (pdf)

Report on the LEED-EB retofit of UCLA's Public Affairs Building: Waste Stream Audit and Occupancy Survey (pdf 2MB) Executive Summary of the Report (pdf under 1MB)

Flier for Climate Change and Your Electricity Bill - May 15 at UCLA Public Affairs Bldg (doc)

Honeybees and Colony Collapse Disorder (pdf)

Memo on the Transportation and Land Use Connection (pdf)

Cap & Share for VMT in CA (pdf)

Cap & Share for Fuel (pdf)

Cap & Share for Water (pdf)

GIS projects (link to my UCLA GIS webpage, works best with Firefox)

Thesis Poster: Carbon Costs: Household Electricity Expenditures from a $15 per ton Cost on Carbon Dioxide Emissions (please contact me for more information about my thesis)

Carbon Costs and Household Electricity Expenditures in California, published as Chapter 2 of California Policy Options 2010

Many people have asked me: Why Los Angeles, and why Urban Planning?

Los Angeles is a challenge. If you can fix it in Los Angeles, you can fix it almost anywhere. For example, the Los Angeles River is paved and horrendous. If you can fix it here, you can teach others not to pave their rivers, but to value their watersheds, and make them the amenities that they are. For another example, Los Angeles is the most autocentric community, but although it is the template for Sacramento and San Jose, it is not the only autocentric community. We need to change this paradigm, and if Los Angeles changes, then those other copycats may change too.

I became interested in Urban Planning as a subject when I was on the Sebastopol City Planning Commission from 2004-2006. I had already been active and participating in local political issues, commenting on Environmental Impact Reports, and attending County Board and Commission meetings as an advocate for protecting watersheds and taking action on global warming for Community Clean Water Institute and the Sonoma County Climate Protection Campaign. As an advocate, I liked the challenge of trying to find the solution that was most sustainable, that could resolve the question of economy versus environment, to try to find the win-win solution. As a Commissioner, I enjoyed hearing from the public, and attempting to balance the priorities of a changing city. I also felt that sometimes the public was wise, and other times, they needed to be educated about the tradeoffs - for example, they might not like traffic on their street, but the need for affordable housing was greater than the impact they might face - additionally, I don't like impermeable surface either, but we have an urban growth boundary in order to direct growth within city limits which preserves the hillsides, and will have less environmental impact due to the denser city that requires fewer car trips and shorter commutes. There were no easy answers, but there were educational opportunities, and practical ways to implement sustainability.

Research ideas:

Should GHGs be part of CEQA? If so, how is a threshhold of significance for GHGs determined in a jurisdiction, or on a project basis? How to include GHGs in General Plans? What happens when GHG reduction goals conflict with other planning goals?
Court of Appeals ruling on GHGs in CEQA 4-28-10

Cities and climate change. How will climate change affect how cities deliver basic services, including transportation, water, sanitation, waste disposal, housing. and more?

Reconciling economics and climate change. When emissions are capped, emission permits may be valuable, and revenues should be granted to people. Some ways to do this are
Carbon Share
Cap and Dividend
Cap and Share

Quotes about Los Angeles and urban planning:

"This sixth most populous spot on earth has killed Nature...Another transformation is due..."
-from The Future of Los Angeles by Paul Glover (Note: Paul Glover is the founder of Ithaca Hours, a local currency system that inspired Sonoma County Community Cash and other programs around the country.

"Decades of systemic under-investment in housing and urban infrastructure, combined with grotesque subsidies for speculators, permissive zoning for commercial development, the absence of effective regional planning, and ludicrously low property taxes for the wealthy have ensured an erosion of the quality of life for the middle classes in older suburbs as well as for the inner-city poor."
-from City of Quartz by Mike Davis

Here are some outside urban planning links:

City of Los Angeles Planning Commission document: "Do Real Planning" (pdf)

Cal APA's Guidelines for Cities and Counties regarding Climate Change (pdf)

A document on Cap and Trade of VMT (pdf) by Joel Woodhull (he was a founder of the Sonoma County Transportation and Land Use Coalition and an advisor on transportation issues to the Climate Protection Campaign, he recently passed away and will be missed)

The City Chicken

More information coming soon...